![]() |
Outpost User Operated Support Forum
Agnitum Outpost Pro Release (OP, OSS, AV): 7.0.2.3377 [23-JUL-2010]
www.agnitum.com |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Localhost:loopback attack
Hello, I have two questions concerning the new 2.5 Outpost I just installed:
1.) I receive a pop-up advising of an Attack: Attack Type: My Address IP Address: localhost:loopback ....... Blocked Connections Logs: 5:35:14 PM SYSTEM IN REFUSED TCP localhost HTTP Address 127.0.0.1 blocked because an attack was detected 5:34:58 PM iexplore.exe OUT REFUSED UDP localhost 1029 Address 127.0.0.1 blocked because an attack was detected 6:16:55 PM iexplore.exe OUT REFUSED UDP localhost 1128 Address 127.0.0.1 blocked because an attack was detected 6:16:22 PM SYSTEM IN REFUSED TCP localhost HTTP Address 127.0.0.1 blocked because an attack was detected ...... I am after this unable to access the internet except for very very slowly. A question: If I put localhost in the attack detection plug-in under exclusions will this leave me vulnerable to an attack, while letting it through? What causes this and what can I do about it? 2.) Every time I access the internet via Internet Explorer I get one of those "Hidden Process requests Network Access" pop-ups. It says that a "hidden process requests an outbound connection"... "The process run through OLE automation requires network access" The process is Iexplore and is launched by either Exporer.exe or Msmin.exe, depending on which app I am accessing the internet from. question: Can this be solved by unchecking the box under 'Open Process Control' in the Components section of Applications, where it says "Block network access if application memory was modified by another process"? I have temporarily solved this by "Allowing access to Hidden Processes" in the Applications section, but this can't be a good way to do it. .... Those are my two basic questions. Can anybody shed any light on these and help out? Thanks much, gunnarj |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
I had the same problem as in your question one, and fixed it by adding 127.0.0.1 to the "Exclusions" in the "Attack Detection" settings. You don't find those settings under the text menu "Options", but only under the graphic "Options" menu. (Very silly and confusing, a GUI bug?)
I came to the forum to ask if the above procedure is ok, and why the "Allow Loopback" rule in the Global section don't suffice? Surely, there got to be thousands of people besides me and gunnarj that will try Outpost and then have their network disabled because of this? This is from my log: [CODE]00:24:20 Rst attack 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 00:14:59 My address 127.0.0.1 2004-10-15 23:53:34 Rst attack 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 2004-10-15 23:45:19 My address 127.0.0.1 2004-10-15 23:34:12 My address 127.0.0.1 2004-10-15 23:22:46 My address 127.0.0.1 2004-10-15 23:08:33 My address 127.0.0.1[/CODE] Last edited by j8ee; 10-15-2004 at 10:57 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
I _still_ get localhost "Attacks", even after adding localhost (127.0.0.1) to the host exlusions in Attack Detections! This is very very strange...
![]() Sometimes it seems like Outpost is stopping network activity too then, but not always, I'm not quite sure how often. Firefox _sometimes_ can't load pages after an "Attack" report, and if so I sometimes have to kill a stray firefox process after closing it down. After restarting, it works again. [CODE]19:06:31 Rst attack 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 19:00:20 My address 127.0.0.1 18:51:44 Rst attack 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 18:49:14 My address 127.0.0.1 18:36:39 Rst attack 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 18:30:40 My address 127.0.0.1 18:20:39 Rst attack 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 18:19:33 My address 127.0.0.1 18:03:45 My address 127.0.0.1 17:47:00 My address 127.0.0.1 [/CODE] Last edited by j8ee; 10-16-2004 at 05:49 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Hello gunnarj and j8ee,
Do you have the Allow Loop Back rule Unticked under>Options>System>Global System>Rules>AllowLoop Back. If not please Untick the Rule anmd see if you still have the problem. Please see Outpost 2.5 - what to expect. Have you tried doing a search of the Forum on Local Host Attack.
__________________
Regards Randy PC Support Forums, Free on line virus Scan, The Parasite Fight, Subratam.org -> Kill Spyware Forums A.S.A.P. Proud member since 2004 ~ |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Quote:
Quote:
Anybody else have a solution to this problem, plus the other I mentioned in the original post? Thanks, gunnarj |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
First try this Uncheck the Block the Intruder IP and the Block subnet mask. Also if you disable the Attack Detection Plug-in does it make any Difference.
Next try stopping the DNS Cache Plug-in. I have it it stopped now because it was slowing down my connection.
__________________
Regards Randy PC Support Forums, Free on line virus Scan, The Parasite Fight, Subratam.org -> Kill Spyware Forums A.S.A.P. Proud member since 2004 ~ Last edited by GoonMan; 10-17-2004 at 07:20 AM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Thanks, I will try disabling both the attack detection plug-in and the dns cache. The attack plugin has been triggered for a good reason a some times the last days though. I have been using the Windows firewall for a few hours now, and haven't had any connection problems or slowdowns yet. Azureus as an example is working much better without Outpost. I guess it could be because of these things:
[CODE]16:36:45 javaw.exe IN REFUSED TCP localhost 1068 Address 127.0.0.1 blocked because an attack was detected 16:36:44 javaw.exe IN REFUSED TCP localhost 1062 Address 127.0.0.1 blocked because an attack was detected 16:36:45 javaw.exe IN REFUSED TCP localhost 1066 Address 127.0.0.1 blocked because an attack was detected[/CODE] Why is it blocked even though I have localhost in the Host exceptions? I guess the Attack Detection plugin/Host Exception rule works in some way, because before I added localhost to the host exeptions Firefox and some other things were blocked instantly from network access. But afterwards, the internet connection is working really bad, and I still get localhost attack detections in the logs, and apparently even a few localhost blocks. How about the Global System rules and "allow loopback", shouldn't the Global rules have higher priority than the Attack Detection plugin? |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Ok, good - all attack warnings are gone since I disabled the Attack Detection plugin! ... :P I think everything is working as expected now actually, with both suggested plugins removed. I guess this is something worth writing to Agnitum about? But I don't know which plugin (or both) that's causing trouble - to know that I would have to disable them one at a time. And I don't feel like doing it now when things are working. But that localhost "attacks" gets reported even when localhost is in the excluded hosts list is actually a bug, I guess?
Thanks GoonMan! Last edited by j8ee; 10-19-2004 at 01:14 PM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Hi,
Is it really that good to disable the Attack Detection Plugin? I have kind of the same problem, and one in this forum told me to richgt click on Attack Detection -> Properties -> Advanced -> Attack List, Edit List -> Uncheck "My Address attack" This seem to work, BUT, does it make my computer less secure? If, it still must be more secure than disable the whloe Attack Detectiopn Plugin i think. /DIFference |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Quote:
Hopefully, there will be an update where this flaw is fixed. gunnarj |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Is there a way to change the rst attack detection settings, so it's not quite as easily triggered? Maybe change the number of rst packets in the advanced settings of the plugin? I guess the number of packets should be raised a bit? (Feels like I have a 50% chance of changing it in the right direction...
) Or adjusting some of the time settings?
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Localhost:loopback attack
The problem is... why attack detection plug-in blocks hosts which are in the exclusion list? This is a big-bug
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Am I under hacker Attack ?? | gjf | Outpost Firewall General Discussions, Support, and Troubleshooting | 1 | 07-06-2003 02:00 PM |
| Rst attack? | Aaronn | Outpost Firewall General Discussions, Support, and Troubleshooting | 4 | 09-18-2002 03:59 PM |
| More About Attack Detection | Luvop | Retired Threads | 5 | 05-08-2002 03:44 AM |
| Attack Detection Plug-in and its configuration in protect.lst | WizzOzz | Retired Threads | 0 | 09-08-2001 04:31 AM |
| Outpost Attack Detection Plug-in | Mikhail | Retired Threads | 2 | 08-31-2001 09:22 PM |